I
dent to allow it. Of course the Gov. may act against
the advice of his Ex. Council, but there are safeguards
has to report such cases to the S. of S.
I would disallow this Ord.. explaining why, and
( in order to relieve the Ex. C. of really trivial
C
he
necenary
in
Lord Crewe
the Colony.
HBr
38/11
I entirely agree.
Proceed as proposed?
برو
777
7.12.
routing ) ask the Gov. to submit the draft of a neh
ما
Ord., explain in each case why the powers may pro-
perly be transferred to the Gov. alone. We might indicate, from Mr. Stubbs' minute, what subjects sem at
sight trivial, and what do not.
Colonel Seely
Acc
Jentuel afsce.
29/11
In addit
I
think that the form (ordie 10f 1885 baclanned belance) ought to consult
his connal as to any
mart claim
tianoflued
for reboyment om my that unde
to general revenue
48
06 (Proteus Publishers)
he
Прив
to have then advice in firing muthing
to a form to abstain from declaring ale
the names of
Similarly
the proprietors.
Ithink that
under 100f99 the Council ought to have a
(1390), Wt, 20024-26, 8000, 11/08, A, & E, W,
(8327).
"
1081-7. 6000, 4/09.
vice
in deciding what lighthous
"beacons
a
first
Proveed
be carefully worded, as
право заровед
it is not pacemany
that the Governor las erred.
the wich when by overzeart for the Expreslation
C2-x11
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.